Published May 15, 2008 12:43 am - The State Fire Marshall’s office has concluded arson was the cause of a fire that occurred at a West Bryant Street apartment Monday and at an adjoining West Bryant Street apartment Tuesday.
Fires ruled arson
Marks second, third fires in two weeks
Alexander Cain
The Union-Recorder
The State Fire Marshall’s office has concluded arson was the cause of a fire that occurred at a West Bryant Street apartment Monday and at an adjoining West Bryant Street apartment Tuesday.
That’s according to a police report issued by the Milledgeville Police Department and fire reports available on both incidents through the Milledgeville Fire Department.
According to the MPD’s report, the State Fire Marshall’s office informed the Milledgeville Police Department on Tuesday that Monday’s fire had been “intentionally set.”
Both units are part of an apartment housing complex owned by Baldwin County Commissioner Geneva Davis.
The Union-Recorder attempted to contact Davis at her residence on Wednesday but did not receive a comment regarding any of her properties on West Bryant Street by press time.
Incident reports available from the MFD list a fire at 130 W. Bryant St., Apt. 2 on Monday at 4:13 p.m. and a fire at 130 W. Bryant St., Apt. 4, on Tuesday at 3:52 p.m. as “under investigation;” however, MFD Fire Chief Tom Dietrich confirmed in a phone interview that the State Fire Marshall’s Office had ruled both apartment fires as arson.
“Both fires have been ruled as arsons. The initial investigations were handled by the Milledgeville Fire Department and the State Fire Marshall’s Office; however, as of Wednesday the case has been turned over to the Milledgeville Police Department and the State Fire Marshall’s Office,” Dietrich said.
The West Bryant street fires come less than two weeks after an April 29 fire at a vacant apartment housing unit located at 1080 N. Wayne St., also owned by Davis.
Chief Dietrich declined to speculate on any relationship between the April 29 case and the fires earlier this week but did state that three fires in the same relative area in such a short period of time were “suspicious.”
“There are always questions that are going to be involved and questions that could arrive after the fact, but when something like this happens and you have three fires within 200 feet of each other in just 10 to 12 days, then that makes you re-evaluate your view of the incidents,” Dietrich said.
In both Monday and Tuesday’s case there was strong evidence of arson, according to Dietrich.
“In Monday’s case, there was nothing there to start it and there was a pour pattern on the floor. We got there so quick and put it out so quick that there was a lot of evidence left. The second fire had more damage but the point of origin was more obvious. The second fire, the one on Tuesday, started on a sofa and there was just nothing there that would have set it on fire,” Dietrich said.
The fire report on Tuesday’s arson spells out in graphic detail the amount of damage done to the apartment as a result of the fire, stating there was “visible flames and heavy smoking” when fire officials arrived at the scene.
The report also hints at a possible point of entry from the person or persons responsible for setting the blaze.
“During the attack the back door was found unlocked and partially open,” the report states.